A Pulitzer-nominated newspaper, ladies and gentleman
Below is a screen capture of a page on the Idaho Statesman's Web site a couple weeks back. I have blurred out the spots where they identified a young sexual abuse victim (I also blurred some of the page tabs for privacy purposes).
Later, the Statesman updated this page and removed the identification, but perhaps some damage was already done. In case you didn't know, identification of sex abuse victims -- especially young ones -- by journalists simply isn't done. This is bush-league. This is outrageous.
girlfriday adds: Adam at Adam's blog linked to this, noting that the Idaho Statesman didn't (fortunately) go to print with this story. It was still a rookie blunder and the consequences could have been devestating for the victim.
Later, the Statesman updated this page and removed the identification, but perhaps some damage was already done. In case you didn't know, identification of sex abuse victims -- especially young ones -- by journalists simply isn't done. This is bush-league. This is outrageous.
girlfriday adds: Adam at Adam's blog linked to this, noting that the Idaho Statesman didn't (fortunately) go to print with this story. It was still a rookie blunder and the consequences could have been devestating for the victim.
Labels: Commentary, Idaho Statesman, Journalism, News, Outrage, The Press
SHARE THIS: Facebook | Stumble It! | Del.icio.us | DiggIt! | Technorati
4 Comments:
You must kidding me! Was it her (his?) full name? It almost seems purposeful.
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
I love that the paper is receiving a Pulitzer for NOT being the ones to leak the Larry Craig debacle.
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Well, if it makes you feel any better this kind of junk is indemic (sp?) (like misspelling words) in the newspaper industry. It's not just the Idaho Statesman.
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Ya, I feel a lot better about everything now. Thanks JEB!
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Post a Comment
<< Home